Khadijah Ana Muslimah

Student at Rutgers/Newark Journalism major
Magazine Posts Table of Contents

WE ARE BECAUSE WE ARE

Posted 2014-11-19 19:37:33 | Views: 1,018
http://wearebecausewecan.wordpress.com/

A TALK ABOUT HUMAN TRAFFICKING

Posted 2014-11-15 17:44:00 | Views: 969

FORT IN THE CITY

Posted 2014-11-15 17:40:12 | Views: 1,087
POLICE REFORM RALLY IN NEWARK NEW JERSEY. MR. NYLE FORT one of the guest speakers. I believe we need to keep and eye on him. He is a Morehouse and Princeton graduate, young and working hard for his community.

A comparison of the minds

Posted 2014-09-18 07:50:46 | Views: 1,089


 The literary genius Chinua Achebe author of Things fall apart, the father of African literature in the English language and one of the most important writers of the second half of the twentieth century. Was a remarkable story-teller, with such detailed writing that makes you feel as part of the story line, like a character or just as someone standing in the side lines looking in the world he created. African literature is in itself is a passage trough time, is like navigating through a sea and discovering new lands. Each one of these lands been more beautiful and amazing than the next.
 The statement below is not part of the novel, but a response to Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, by Chinua Acebe, “But you have to understand. Art is more than just good sentences; this is what makes this situation tragic. The man is a capable artist and as such I expect better from him. I mean, what is his point in that book? Art is not intended to put people down. If so, then art would ultimately discredit itself.”
 Truly if we compare one novel to the other we can see the contrast of both writers. One with the a detail story line that come from the knowledge of the real African history and the other with the vain misconception of all Africans are savages, ignorant and need saving. Keeping in mind Achebe’s statement will help you understand the impact of a writer as an artist to bring art in clean, factual and responsible matter. How responsible are writers today? This irresponsibility has transcended to all types of media. Can this statement be applied in today writers of any type of media? Judge for yourself.


NEGRTUD Y NEGRISMO: A comparison of blackness

Posted 2014-09-16 15:58:36 | Views: 1,149
     

     Negritude as for the dictionary is the quality or fact of being of black African origin. It can also be defined as the affirmation of consciousness of the values of black or African culture, heritage and identity. Negritude was a cultural movement started in Paris, in the 1930s, by French speaking blacks. They were black graduated students from French speaking colonies in Africa and the Caribbean. These black intellectuals’ united issues of race identity and black internationalist initiatives to combat French imperialism. It was more than just a fight; they found solidarity and a common reason to fight for their ideals. Like affirming pride in their shared black identity and African heritage, taking back Africa self-respect, reliance and determination.

     The Negritude movement was created to harm discredit the long theory of race hierarchy and black inferiority developed by philosophers such Fedrich Hegel and Joseph de Gobineau. The movement attracts names like, anthropologist Leo Frobenius and Maurice Delafosse, who wrote a novel about the abuses and injustices with the French colonial system. We have Andre Brenton, the father of Surrealism, Haitian Jean Price Mars who develop the concept of Indigenism and Cuban Nicolas Guillen, who promoted Negrismo.

     Women involved in this movement were as bright as the men. Among them were Jane and Paulette Nardal and a Martinican student by the name of Suzanne Roussi Cesaire usefully outlines Negritude cultural politics. They wrote many articles, Jane Nardal wrote “Exotic puppets, 1928”, Paulette wrote; “In exile, 1929” and Suzane wrote “The Malaise of a civilization.” These women promoted race consciousness through their articles. These publications and many others influenced discussions on race and identity among the black; founded Negritude. We just met the mothers of Negritude, and who are the fathers of Negritude? In 1931the encounter of Cesaire, Senghor and Damas marks the new era of discovery and exploration of their identities as black, African, Antillean and French. The Negritude movement was to be evidence for the world; not only that they were black but also intelligent and capable of magnificent work. Aime Cesaire states, “Negritude is the simple recognition of the fact of one is black, the acceptance of this fact and of our destiny as blacks, of our history and culture.” Negritude positioned black people at the same level as any other race, in a global community of equals.

     Each man had a specific way to relate their blackness, they all agreed to their blackness, but the way they express it was totally different. Their passion drove them to glorious work and they also turn into the point of critique of many. Wole Soyinka was a major critic of the movement. He states, “the tiger does not proclaim is tigerness, it jumps on its prey.” He saw no need to claim blackness or greatness trough the movement, like a tiger don’t need to announce itself to its prey, blacks should just let go of such absurd ideology; people already know who they are. “The concept of Negritude is a defining milestone in the rehabilitation of Africa and African diaspora their identity and dignity. It is a driving inspiration behind the current flowering of literature by black Francophone writers, along other Pan-African movements such as the Harlem Renaissance, Garveyism, and Negrismo. Négritude has contributed to writing Africa and its achievements back into history, as well as fostering solidarity among Africans and people of African descent.” (Bertrade Ngo-Ngijol Banoum-Lehman College)

    In 1921 Negrismo was born in Cuba. It is the celebration of black-Cuban music, rhythm, folklore, literature, poetry, and art. Negrismo extend not only to the physical body but it brought forth a way to introduce music, dance, instruments, and food, languages, religions, myths, and beliefs. They gave the essence of Africa not as cultured minds but as creators of their own path. They expose the world not only to readings from the best, but also took back through the arts everything lost when the Africans were removed from their country. It was a movement that I believe it was more of the minds than that of a fight. With the works from Nicolas Guillen, Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, Silvestre de Balboa, Rubén Dariío, and Luis Palés Matos; to mention a few, Negrismo became a way to liberate the soul, identify self and learn about the roots for ever lost. Nicolas Guillen became one of the most influential Cubans in the era of Negrismo. In 1930, “Motivos de Son,” Guillen’s poetry collection was published and Luis Pales Matos’ ”Danza Negra,” literary publications that later became part of the Afro-Caribbean movement. Negrismo represented the Afro-Caribbean culture rising into the changes that will give birth to the most brilliant minds ever misrepresented because of the color of their skin. Negrismo and the Harlem Renaissance were one of the same, valuable music, poetry, paintings, dance, rhythms that paved the changes and resources creating a new vision of the African man. Blackness, been from the African, the Caribbean or the Latin American heritage gave these men and women a reason to fight not with arms but with the pen, the drums and intellect. It was one common goal, that goal was to show the world, who attentively wanted to prove how right were there assumptions about Africans overall.

     Negritude and Negrismo were the representation of an era were the Afro-Caribbean’s re-invented themselves demonstrating the capacity and capability is not about color is about intellect. Both movements received a stamp in history and forever becoming the voice of a culture.

Bibliography

Connolly, Allison “Understanding Negritude”

October 11th, 2012. http://exhibitions.nypl.org/africanaage/essay-negritude

 



JOURNALISM 101

Posted 2014-09-15 16:16:26 | Views: 1,052
Journalism in 2013, have our obligation to society changed?      

By: Catherine Costello

Does journalism have a code of ethics? Do we need to be mindful of the people we serve as a journalist?

Journalism reliability is compromise by the actions of few. Today journalism is not about writing the truth, trough an objective eye. Journalism is more about giving the public by any means necessary a story. Regardless of the pressure which will be directed at a particular group of people, an individual, a business or a country.

What is the function of journalism in society? As technology moves forward we can catch a glimpse of the constant transformation in the media as a whole. The newspaper, magazine, news broadcasting is becoming a thing of the past. The internet has taken public media hostage, everything is printable, everything is news, and we seem to forget that our statements will follow us. We are allowing all forms of news to reach the viewers, listeners and readers yet with no confirmation on its veracity. Journalists are responsible to convey the truth, and yet we have to watch how technology alters the truth. Technology has made journalism an inconsistent and unreliable source in the 21st century. “The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society’s principles and standards of practice.” (Copyright@1996-2013Society of Professional Journalists) These words give us an idea of the code of ethics a journalist should follow. Can we honestly say we observe these qualities or individual characteristics in a journalist should observe? The Society of Professional Journalist Code of Ethics is one of the most accredited societies and there code of ethics is “embraced by thousands of journalist regardless of place or platforms” (www.spj.org/ethicscode).

Here I give my readers the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics: (www.spj.org/ethicscode).

Seek Truth and Report It
Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.

Journalists should:

— Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.

Minimize Harm
Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect.

Journalists should:

— Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
Act Independently
Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public’s right to know.

Journalists should:

—Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
— remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.

Be Accountable
Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each other.

Journalists should:

— Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the public over journalistic conduct.
I posted one from each category in order for the reader to catch a glimpse of the conduct a journalist should maintain and observe. Can such conduct be observed in journalism?

For more information visit the web site The Society of Professional Journalist.